Planning
|
NETA
|
Network/infrastructure issues
|
Financing
|
NFFO/SRO contract issues
|
Enhanced capital allowances
|
General - Summary
|
Capital grants for renewable energy
|
|
Planning
|
Almost all renewable energy projects can encounter difficulties in gaining planning permission. Because renewable energy plants are generally small, in comparison with conventional power stations, a large number will be needed if we are to deliver 10% of the UK’s electricity from renewable sources by 2010. |
The RPA is also addressing aspects of planning where renewable sources result in energy which is NOT electrical, for instance biofuels.
The RPA has a draft proposal for a comprehensive educational programme in co-operation with other parties. This proposal is targeted regionally to inform the public and planning authorities on the overall Renewable Energy Planning issues. For more information, contact the RPA.
|
The industry is often frustrated by the planning environment in the UK, as it tends to hinder rather than help the industry deliver the Government’s targets. |
RPA members believe the system needs to be improved from the project developer’s perspective, as planning represents one of, if not the most significant barriers to the deployment of renewables. |
www.planning.detr.gov.uk/consult/greenpap Planning Green Paper: Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change
|
www.planning.odpm.gov.uk/ General information on planning from Office of Deputy Prime Minister
|
|
|
|
NETA
|
In the spring of 2001, New Electricity Trading Arrangements replaced the Electricity Pool of England and Wales. These new arrangements, known as “NETA”, have de-valued the electricity generated by smaller power plants, in particular those whose output is intermittent, such as wind and small hydro plant.
NETA is very complex and few people claim to understand it fully. However, it is acknowledged that NETA has disadvantaged renewable generators, a move which runs counter to Government policy to expand the use of green power sources
|
On 24th July 2002, OFGEM issued The review of the first year of NETA The document (comprising two volumes) can be located at: http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/docs2002/48neta_year_review.pdf There is also a four page glossy summarising the positives.
|
Ofgem's Conclusions:
- NETA is performing well against the objectives set by Ofgem and DTI;
- NETA reforms – alongside other factors such as falling fuel prices, a generous capacity margin and increased competition in generation – have resulted in a 40% reduction in the costs of wholesale electricity since 1998;
- prices over the first year of NETA (March 2001-March 2002) fell by 20%;
- flexible governance has allowed significant changes to be made to the balancing and settlement rules;
- smaller generators who replied to Ofgem’s latest survey reported that output levels were slightly up compared with the previous year. This position is in contrast to the reduced output reported after two months of NETA operation in the last review in August 2001;
- prices for smaller generators compare reasonably with prices received by larger generators and in some cases, where they attract Government help, are better;
- most electricity is now being traded like any other commodity and market liquidity has continued to increase by more than 200% in the first year of NETA;
- modifications and experience of the new market have led to significantly reduced price volatility in the balancing mechanism; and
- participants’ imbalance costs make very little impact on overall wholesale electricity costs.
|
The RPA does not agree with the gloss presented by OFGEM and is preparing a studied response to this report. At a business luncheon on 24th July, OFGEM hosted a wide number of environmental groups, including the RPA, to solicit high level and detailed input for Ofgem to expand upon its obligation to social and environmental issues. |
www.ofgem.gov.uk/elarch/reta.htm when NETA went live
|
www.elexon.co.uk/ information since NETA went live
|
www.ofgem.gov.uk/projects/betta_index.htm British Electricity Trading and Transmission Arrangements (BETTA) (the reform of Scottish wholesale electricity trading)
|
|
|
|
Network/infrastructure issues
|
The electricity supply network in the UK is tailored to deliver power flows from large fossil and nuclear plant, down through progressively lower voltage levels to reach business and domestic customers. |
The vast majority of renewable power plants are small in comparison with conventional plant and they are connected to the lower voltage distribution grid rather than the high voltage transmission grid. The term for this form of generation is “embedded” or “distributed generation”. |
The manner in which the network is configured, operated and paid for was not designed with embedded generators in mind. The result is that it can be prohibitively expensive for a prospective renewable generation plant to connect to the distribution grid. Furthermore, there is little incentive for the operators of the distribution network to adapt to accommodate the large amount of embedded generator required to meet both the renewables and combined heat and power targets. |
These issues are being addressed and the RPA is working in collaboration with the Combined Heat and Power Association to keep embedded generators informed of the work, see the links below. If you wish to be kept informed, follow the coming additions to this website entry, or indeed suggest linked articles and contributions. |
www.distributed-generation.org.uk/ Distributed Generation Coordinating Group
|
www.econnect.co.uk Econnect
|
www.ilex.co.uk ILEX Energy Consulting
|
www.chpa.org.uk/ The Combined Heat and Power Association
|
|
|
|
Financing
|
The Renewables Obligation requires suppliers to purchase a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable generators. Unlike the previous government policy to promote renewable electricity generation, the arrangements between generators and suppliers are bi-lateral contracts, subject to negotiation between both parties. These are referred to as “Power Purchase Agreements” or “Power Purchase Contracts” (PPAs or PPCs). |
If a project developer wants to build a renewable power plant, he/she is likely to need to borrow money from a bank to finance the project. Bankers need to be comfortable that the money they lend can be repayed. They therefore want to make sure that the PPA/PPC between the supplier and project developer is sufficiently robust over a 10-15 year time frame, in order that the generator makes enough income to repay the debt. |
A contract under the renewable Obligation carries many more risks. The bullet points on below are taken from a slide presentation at an RPA-organised finance seminar, by Michael Starmer-Smith of Deutsche Bank |
Business risks
- Will the wind blow?
- Technology
- Development and construction
- Scale
Uncertain cashflows
- NETA
- Impact of overbuild on future electricity
- prices
- Credit quality of off-takers, PPAs
- Value of Renewables Obligation
- Certificates
- Value of Climate Change Levy Exemption Certificates
Changing bank attitudes
- Performance of recent UK power project financings
- Basle II impact on profitability of project finance
- Post Enron attitudes towards structured finance
Political risks
- Changes to regulation
- Changes to ROC system
- Changes to Climate Change Levy
|
|
|
|
NFFO/SRO contract issues
|
Although no new NFFO or SRO orders will be made there are still many hundreds of megawatts of contracts still to be commissioned. Uncommissioned projects are listed on the NFPA website, to which you will find a link below. Now that these contracts can be relocated there is renewed interest in some of them. |
There are still active issues on which the RPA is lobbying in relation to NFFO contracts. The RPA has been successful in its lobbying for an easier way for NFFO generators to sell additional metered output from NFFO 4 and 5 projects.
The RPA is also lobbying for a clear process by which uneconomic contracts can be terminated.
For more information contact the RPA.
|
|
|
www.nfpa.co.uk/index.htm NFPA website
|
|
|
Enhanced capital allowances
|
Enhanced capital allowances |
|
|
|
www.eca.gov.uk The Enhanced Capital Allowance Scheme
|
|
|
General - Summary
|
Six main barriers to renewable energy development' comments David Byers, CEO of the RPA, 'despite general agreement within government, opposition parties and informed observers lacking a vested interest. The RPA general policy is to initiate and support efforts to remove these barriers and so achieve confidence for investors to actually deliver the Megawatts the government seeks. |
- Planning in the UK is very democratic but the process is slow, expensive for developers and frustrates national policy, not merely at local level but from agencies such as the MOD.
- NETA still arbitrarily and unnecessarily discriminates against Renewable Energy development. A competitive marketplace where government policy to encourage Renewable Development has been ignored is not a success. Ofgem celebrates the reduction of market spread from £70/MWh to a mere £17/MWh. 'In which competitive markets is a 121% spread on selling price a cause for celebration' asks David Byers, RPA Chief Executive, 'especially given the added uncertainty of ROC values and network barriers?
|
- CONNECTIONbarriers increase the cost and complexity of Renewable energy developments, which can be remote from demand (eg offshore Scotland) or close to demand in rural areas. Commercial barriers remain where incentives do not exist for DNO companies to seek connection, and hardly any recognition is given to the commercial and technical benefit of imbedded generation.
- Finance is crucial to developers, yet the relative immaturity and market-based nature of the Renewable Obligation causes banks to be very conservative in lending or debt/equity ratios. 'The R.O. system is an invitation for balance sheets and six supply companies to control the market' comments David Byers “with huge discounts applied to headline renewable energy prices for generators.
|
- Governmental Support/connections: Not only may there be harmonisation issues within Europe, redefining what is 'renewable', but the bureaucracy even between UK departments is difficult for developers to navigate. The RPA seeks to establish a role unifying approaches to these diverse groups.
- Diversity Loss: Current UK policy seeks not to 'choose winners' and to demonstrate under EU law that market solutions are found at least cost within an overall policy. Grant structures seek to encourage longer term and 'out of market' technologies without addressing incentives which foster wider-based renewable contribution and global competitivity for UK manufacturers and production bases.
|
|
|
Capital grants for renewable energy
|
If you are interested in receiving further details of grant schemes for
- Offshore Wind
- Energy Crops
- Community and Household
- Biomass Heat/CHP
Follow the links below to the DTI website and fill in your details in the electronic register below.
The second link is to the Solar Grants home page, which is designed to introduce the Department of Trade and Industry's £20 million first phase of the major photovoltaic (PV) demonstration programme.
|
|
|
|
www.dti.gov.uk/renew/eoi.htm To register an interest in capital grants for Offshore Wind, Energy Crops, Community and Household and Biomass Heat/CHP
|
www.est.org.uk/solar/ Solar Grants home page
|
|
|